Re: Pneumonie Atypique
Posté: 18 Juin 2020, 22:07
sheon a écrit:Apparemment, sur Comédie +.
Ah ok... Je pensais que c'était "ancien" !
sheon a écrit:Apparemment, sur Comédie +.
Maverick a écrit:Je suis encore très majoritairement en télétravail et ça va continuer jusqu'à la rentrée normalement (Je bosse dans un ministère). Ce confinement aura au moins permis une chose, c'est d'accélérer la mise en place du télétravail pour les boîtes qui y étaient réfractaires.
Hugues a écrit:Merci 1er tigre je n'avais pas entendu parler de ça...
À propos, pour l'anecdote, pour être correct, il vaut mieux dire Rt. Parce que R0 c'est le initial, quand le virus prend les gens par surprise (bref c'est l'intéraction entre le virus et les habitudes normales des gens). Tandis que Rt c'est la valeur qui varie suivant le temps, donc suivant ce que font les gens pour contenir le virus. (Bon c'est petit 0 et petit t pour l'anecdote de l'anecdote)
Hugues
Hugues a écrit:Collabo de la Macronie!!!
Maverick a écrit:Ce confinement aura au moins permis une chose, c'est d'accélérer la mise en place du télétravail pour les boîtes qui y étaient réfractaires.
1er tigre a écrit:Le R0 qui était stable voire baissait depuis le début du déconfinement, remonte de façon notable pour se rapprocher du fameux seuil de 1, et le dépasse dans 3 régions déjà..
Hugues a écrit:Maverick a écrit:Je suis encore très majoritairement en télétravail et ça va continuer jusqu'à la rentrée normalement (Je bosse dans un ministère). Ce confinement aura au moins permis une chose, c'est d'accélérer la mise en place du télétravail pour les boîtes qui y étaient réfractaires.
Collabo de la Macronie!!!
Hugues
Stéphane a écrit:Perso, je retourne au bureau depuis début mai. Et vu le monde de plus en plus présent sur les routes, je suis pas le seul.
Feyd a écrit:Marrant de revoir ceci aujourd'hui
« Il a fait le job » au cœur d’une crise inédite… Olivier Véran, le « médecin de terrain » devenu atout du gouvernement
POLITIQUE Alors qu’un remaniement ministériel se profile, Olivier Véran ferait partie de ceux qui ne risquent pas de perdre leur fauteuil
Nicklaus a écrit:Bordel. j'ai à nouveau mal à la gorge depuis 2 jours, exactement comme en mars. Ca va pas recommencer cette merde.
Alfa a écrit:Nicklaus a écrit:Bordel. j'ai à nouveau mal à la gorge depuis 2 jours, exactement comme en mars. Ca va pas recommencer cette merde.
T'avais réussi a te faire tester a l'époque?
Nicklaus a écrit:Non. C'était encore le début de l'épidémie en France et comme il y avait eu beaucoup de grippes dans le coin, le médecin n'a pas cherché plus loin même quand mes poumons ont commencé à souffrir après avoir pris du spifen. J'y suis retourné en mai à cause de mes côtes douloureuses, il a parlé du test mais ne l'a pas prescrit. Ce matin, quelques centaines de mètres à pieds et j'étais vidé, impossible de lever mes jambes. Je ne fais jamais de sport mais il y a encore quelques mois, j'étais capable de marcher 30 minutes sans aucun problème.
Nicklaus a écrit:melbourne à nouveau confinée pour 6 semaines.
NY Times a écrit:Trump administration sends formal notification of U.S. withdrawal from the W.H.O., effective next year.
The Trump administration has formally notified the United Nations that the United States is withdrawing from the World Health Organization, officials said Tuesday, cutting off one of the organization’s biggest sources of aid amid a global pandemic that has infected more than 11.6 million people, killed more than a half a million, and upended life around the world.
“The United States’ notice of withdrawal, effective July 6, 2021, has been submitted to the UN Secretary-General, who is the depository for the W.H.O.,” said a senior administration official.
By law the United States must give the organization a year’s notice if it intends to withdraw, and meet all the current financial obligations in the current year.
Mr. Trump, whose response to the pandemic has drawn criticism, first announced that he planned to halt funding to the W.H.O. in April, claiming that the organization had made a series of mistakes as it battled the virus. The biennial budget for the W.H.O. is about $6 billion, which comes from member countries around the world. In 2019, the last year for which figures were available, the United States contributed about $553 million.
His move drew immediate criticism, including from Senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey, who wrote on Twitter that Congress had just received notification of the withdrawal. “This won’t protect American lives or interests — it leaves Americans sick & America alone,” he wrote.
The president of the United Nations Foundation, Elizabeth Cousens, said in a statement that the administration’s “move to formally withdraw from W.H.O. amid the greatest public health crisis that Americans and the world have faced in a century is shortsighted, unnecessary, and unequivocally dangerous.”
The W.H.O., founded in 1948, is a postwar creation of the United Nations — and is the world’s premier global health organization. Mr. Trump turned on the organization this spring, accusing it of doing too little to warn the world of the outbreak.
In fact, the agency issued its first alarm on Jan. 4, just five days after the local health department of Wuhan announced a cluster of 27 cases of an unusual pneumonia at a local seafood market, and followed up with a detailed report the next day.
Lawrence Gostin, the director of the W.H.O.’s Collaborating Center on National & Global Health Law, called the decision “among the most ruinous presidential decisions in recent history.”
“It will make Americans less safe during an unprecedented global health crisis,” he said. “And it will significantly weaken U.S. influence on W.H.O. reform and international health diplomacy. This disastrous action is deeply damaging to U.S. national interests.”
Experts acknowledged that the W.H.O. has made some missteps during the pandemic, but said that it has largely done well given the constraints under which it operates. The agency is coordinating clinical trials of treatments, as well as efforts to manufacture and equitably distribute the vaccine worldwide.
Dr. Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said that the administration’s move to withdraw “will both harm Trump administration sends formal notification of U.S. withdrawal from the W.H.O., effective next year.
The Trump administration has formally notified the United Nations that the United States is withdrawing from the World Health Organization, officials said Tuesday, cutting off one of the organization’s biggest sources of aid amid a global pandemic that has infected more than 11.6 million people, killed more than a half a million, and upended life around the world.
“The United States’ notice of withdrawal, effective July 6, 2021, has been submitted to the UN Secretary-General, who is the depository for the W.H.O.,” said a senior administration official.
By law the United States must give the organization a year’s notice if it intends to withdraw, and meet all the current financial obligations in the current year.
Mr. Trump, whose response to the pandemic has drawn criticism, first announced that he planned to halt funding to the W.H.O. in April, claiming that the organization had made a series of mistakes as it battled the virus. The biennial budget for the W.H.O. is about $6 billion, which comes from member countries around the world. In 2019, the last year for which figures were available, the United States contributed about $553 million.
His move drew immediate criticism, including from Senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey, who wrote on Twitter that Congress had just received notification of the withdrawal. “This won’t protect American lives or interests — it leaves Americans sick & America alone,” he wrote.
The president of the United Nations Foundation, Elizabeth Cousens, said in a statement that the administration’s “move to formally withdraw from W.H.O. amid the greatest public health crisis that Americans and the world have faced in a century is shortsighted, unnecessary, and unequivocally dangerous.”
The W.H.O., founded in 1948, is a postwar creation of the United Nations — and is the world’s premier global health organization. Mr. Trump turned on the organization this spring, accusing it of doing too little to warn the world of the outbreak.
In fact, the agency issued its first alarm on Jan. 4, just five days after the local health department of Wuhan announced a cluster of 27 cases of an unusual pneumonia at a local seafood market, and followed up with a detailed report the next day.
Lawrence Gostin, the director of the W.H.O.’s Collaborating Center on National & Global Health Law, called the decision “among the most ruinous presidential decisions in recent history.”
“It will make Americans less safe during an unprecedented global health crisis,” he said. “And it will significantly weaken U.S. influence on W.H.O. reform and international health diplomacy. This disastrous action is deeply damaging to U.S. national interests.”
Experts acknowledged that the W.H.O. has made some missteps during the pandemic, but said that it has largely done well given the constraints under which it operates. The agency is coordinating clinical trials of treatments, as well as efforts to manufacture and equitably distribute the vaccine worldwide.
Dr. Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said that the administration’s move to withdraw “will both harm Trump administration sends formal notification of U.S. withdrawal from the W.H.O., effective next year.
The Trump administration has formally notified the United Nations that the United States is withdrawing from the World Health Organization, officials said Tuesday, cutting off one of the organization’s biggest sources of aid amid a global pandemic that has infected more than 11.6 million people, killed more than a half a million, and upended life around the world.
“The United States’ notice of withdrawal, effective July 6, 2021, has been submitted to the UN Secretary-General, who is the depository for the W.H.O.,” said a senior administration official.
By law the United States must give the organization a year’s notice if it intends to withdraw, and meet all the current financial obligations in the current year.
Mr. Trump, whose response to the pandemic has drawn criticism, first announced that he planned to halt funding to the W.H.O. in April, claiming that the organization had made a series of mistakes as it battled the virus. The biennial budget for the W.H.O. is about $6 billion, which comes from member countries around the world. In 2019, the last year for which figures were available, the United States contributed about $553 million.
His move drew immediate criticism, including from Senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey, who wrote on Twitter that Congress had just received notification of the withdrawal. “This won’t protect American lives or interests — it leaves Americans sick & America alone,” he wrote.
The president of the United Nations Foundation, Elizabeth Cousens, said in a statement that the administration’s “move to formally withdraw from W.H.O. amid the greatest public health crisis that Americans and the world have faced in a century is shortsighted, unnecessary, and unequivocally dangerous.”
The W.H.O., founded in 1948, is a postwar creation of the United Nations — and is the world’s premier global health organization. Mr. Trump turned on the organization this spring, accusing it of doing too little to warn the world of the outbreak.
In fact, the agency issued its first alarm on Jan. 4, just five days after the local health department of Wuhan announced a cluster of 27 cases of an unusual pneumonia at a local seafood market, and followed up with a detailed report the next day.
Lawrence Gostin, the director of the W.H.O.’s Collaborating Center on National & Global Health Law, called the decision “among the most ruinous presidential decisions in recent history.”
“It will make Americans less safe during an unprecedented global health crisis,” he said. “And it will significantly weaken U.S. influence on W.H.O. reform and international health diplomacy. This disastrous action is deeply damaging to U.S. national interests.”
Experts acknowledged that the W.H.O. has made some missteps during the pandemic, but said that it has largely done well given the constraints under which it operates. The agency is coordinating clinical trials of treatments, as well as efforts to manufacture and equitably distribute the vaccine worldwide.
Dr. Ashish Jha, director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said that the administration’s move to withdraw “will both harm global public health and harm the health of the American people.”
Hugues a écrit:Personne n'en parle à ma connaissance nulle part, mais il y a potentiellement un problème en Moselle.
38 hospitalisations (ce qui signifie sans doute beaucoup plus de cas) le 3 juillet sur 24h.
C'était entre 0 et 1 depuis de semaines (et plus souvent 0 que 1).
Et il faut remonter au 24 avril pour que ce soit égal ou plus haut en Moselle.
Hugues
1er tigre a écrit:Hugues a écrit:Personne n'en parle à ma connaissance nulle part, mais il y a potentiellement un problème en Moselle.
38 hospitalisations (ce qui signifie sans doute beaucoup plus de cas) le 3 juillet sur 24h.
C'était entre 0 et 1 depuis de semaines (et plus souvent 0 que 1).
Et il faut remonter au 24 avril pour que ce soit égal ou plus haut en Moselle.
Hugues
Finalement fausse alerte ? On n'en a pas entendu parler dans les média et les chiffres d'hospitalisations généraux sont toujours à la baisse (moins forte certes mais ça continue de baisser pas mal).
PS : comment fais-tu pour avoir ces chiffres ?